The following story is brought to you courtesy of Red State. Click the link to visit their page and see more stories
Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) was desperate not to release the transcripts of testimony in the Russian investigation, but finally, he had to when the Director of National Intelligence Ric Grennell forced his hand and said he was going to if Schiff didn’t.
The transcripts then readily showed why Schiff didn’t want them out.
Obama official after Obama official had to admit under oath that they had seen no evidence of any collusion by the Trump campaign team with the Russians.
Then, on top of that, Crowdstrike’s Shaun Henry also testified that while they believed that Russia had hacked the DNC server, they did not have concrete evidence that data was “exfiltrated” (removed) out of it. The FBI was never allowed to look at the server itself by the DNC and had to rely on Crowdstrike’s interpretation.
Tucker Carlson took off on that and then highlighted the multiple times that Schiff has claimed not only that there was evidence of collusion but that he knew of it and had seen it.
What is that ample evidence of collusion that Schiff says he knew of? We have never seen it because it does not exist, as all the testimony shows.
Whatever one thinks about the server hack, it’s clear that there was never any evidence of collusion found.
Yet Schiff continues to claim it exists. This was how he tried to spin the released documents that blew him apart.
He’s still lying even now.
So, this must mean that Schiff is withholding that evidence from everyone else on earth and needs to be investigated for doing so, right? He’s withholding material evidence in a criminal investigation.
This is really shameful at this point. The House should call for his resignation and/or refer him to the Ethics Committee. They won’t because they have no shame.